Skip Navigation Links weather.gov 
NOAA logo-Select to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service Forecast Office   Select to go to the NWS homepage
Pacific ENSO Applications Climate Center
banner piece
  banner piece
Local forecast by
"City, St" or Zip Code
Pacific ENSO Update

3rd Quarter, 2010 Vol. 16 No. 3


SEASONAL SEA LEVEL OUTLOOKS FOR THE U.S.-AFFILIATED PACIFIC ISLANDS


The following sections describe: (i) the Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) forecasts for seasonal (mean and maxima) sea-level deviations for the forthcoming seasons JAS, ASO, and SON of 2010, (ii) the observed monthly mean and maximum sea-level deviations for the season AMJ 2010, (iii) forecast verifications for AMJ 2010 (observed/forecast values). Note that the deviations are defined here as ‘the difference between the mean sea level for the given month and the 1975 through 1995 mean sea level value computed at each station’. (See Figure 2 at right for location of these stations.) Also note that, the CCA-forecasting technique adapted here accounts for ENSO-related sea-level deviations and does not account for sea-level deviations created by other atmospheric or geological factors such as tropical cyclones, storm surges or tsunamis.

tide station location
 

(i) Seasonal sea level forecast (deviations with respect to climatology) for JAS, ASO, and SON of 2010

Forecasts of the mean and maximum sea-level deviations in the USAPI are presented using CCA statistical model. Based on the independent SST values in AMJ 2010, the resulting CCA model has been used to forecast the sea level of three consecutive three-month periods: JAS, ASO, and SON of 2010 (see Table 1). CCA cross-validation forecast skills for 0, 1, and 2-month leads are presented in Fig. 3.

Table 1 : Forecasts of MEAN and MAXIMUM sea level deviation in inches for forthcoming seasons

 
(1) Seasonal Mean Deviations
(2) Seasonal Maximum Deviations
Tide Gauge Station
JAS
ASO
SON

(3) Forecast Quality

JAS
ASO
SON
(3) Forecast Quality
(4) RP for JAS Season
(5) Lead Time
0
1M
2M
0
1M
2M
20 yr
100 yr
Marianas, Guam
+5
+3
+2
Good
+20
+20
+18
Very Good
6.3
10.9
Malakal, Palau
+5
+5
+4
Very Good
+40
+42
+40
Good
8.1
10.2
Yap, FSM
+5
+4
+3
Very Good
+31
+32
+30
Good
8.4
11.3
Chuuk, FSM**
+3
+3
+3
N/A
+31
+31
+33
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pohnpei, FSM
+3
+3
+3
Good
+31
+31
+33
Good
5.8
7.0
Kapingamarangi, FSM
+2
+2
+3
Good
+27
+27
+28
Fair
3.5
4.2
Majuro, RMI
+2
+2
+3
Good
+41
+43
+44
Fair
5.2
6.8
Kwajalein, RMI
+2
+2
+2
Good
+40
+40
+40
Fair
4.1
5.2
Pago Pago, AS
+3
+3
+3
Very Good
+28
+27
+27
Very Good
4.1
5.4
Honolulu, Hawaii (6)
+2
+2
+3
Fair
+21
+20
+21
Fair
3.4
5.7
Hilo, Hawaii (6)
+2
+3
+3
Good
+24
+24
+24
Good
6.4
7.7

Remarks: The forecast values for the JAS, ASO, and SON seasons (Table 1 above) indicate that sea levels for most of the stations in the north Pacific are likely to rise in the forthcoming seasons. The maximums will also be higher than normal during the same time period (Table 1, right panel). This will be due to prevailing stronger-than-average westerly wind anomalies in the vicinity of western and central tropical Pacific. The Hawaiian stations are also likely to be slightly elevated during the same time period.

The forecast values of sea level for the coming seasons are supportive of a borderline La Niña condition, which recently appeared in mid-June.

Note: (-) indicate negative deviations (fall of sea-level from the mean), and (+) indicate positive deviations (rise of sea-level from the mean), n/a: data not available; also note that any deviations from -1 to +1 inches are considered negligible and deviations from -2 to +2 inches are unlikely to cause any adverse climatic impact. Forecasts for Chuuk (**) are estimated subjectively based on information from WSO Chuuk and observations from neighboring stations of Pohnpei and Yap.

(1) Seasonal Mean Deviations is defined as the difference between the mean sea level for the given month and the 1975-1995 mean sea level value at each station. Likewise, (2) Seasonal Maximum Deviations is defined as the difference between the maximum sea level (calculated from hourly data) for the given month and the 1975-1995 mean sea level value at each station.

(3) Forecast Quality is a measure of the expected CCA cross-validation correlation skill. In general terms, these forecasts are thought to be of useful (but poor) skill if the CCA cross-validation value lies between 0.3 ~ 0.4 (Fig. 3). Higher skills correspond to a greater expected accuracy of the forecasts. Skill levels greater than 0.4 and 0.6 are thought to be fair and good, respectively, while skill levels greater than 0.7 are thought to be very good.

(4) Return Period (RP) of extreme values is calculated from hourly sea-level data. For example, the predicted rise of 5.6 inches at 20-year RP at Marianas, Guam indicates that this station may experience an extreme tide event once every 20 years that could result in sea-level rise of up to 6.3 inches above the median of seasonal maxima during the JAS season. Likewise, about once every 100 years we can expect the highest JAS tide at Marianas, Guam to be as high as 10.9 inches above the median of seasonal maxima. During some seasons some stations display alarmingly high values at the 20 and 100 year RP. These high values are due to large and significant increases in the tidal range caused by the passage of past storm events during that season. Click here to view probability of exceedence graphs for the JAS season.

(5) Lead time is the time interval between the end of the initial period and the beginning of the forecast period. For example, lead-0, lead-1M, and lead-2M means ‘sea-level’ of target season 0 (JAS), 1 (ASO), and 2 (SON) month leads based on SSTs of AMJ 2010.

 

(ii) Observed monthly sea level deviation in Apirl-May-June (AMJ) 2010 Season

The monthly time series (April-June 2010) for sea-level deviations have been taken from the UH Sea Level Center. Note that ‘deviation’ is defined here as ‘the observed or forecast difference between the monthly mean [or maximum] and the climatological monthly mean values (from the period 1975- 1995) computed at each station’.. Locations of all these stations are shown in Figure 2 (top of page).

 

Table 2: Monthly observed MEAN and MAX sea level deviations in inches for April, May, and June, with year to year standard deviations (SD).

Tide Gauge Station

(1) Monthly Mean Deviations
(2) Monthly Maximum Deviations
Apr
May
Jun
SD
Apr
May
Jun
SD
Marianas, Guam
+2.9
+4.4
+5.2
(+3.7)
+15.9
+18.5
+20.5
(+3.9)
Malakal, Palau
+2.9
+5.9
+10.1
(+4.0)
+36.5
+38.6
+42.4
(+3.8)
Yap, FSM
-0.5
+2.7
+4.3
(+3.4)
+28.2
+26.6
+28.3
(+4.0)
Chuuk, FSM **
*
*
*
(*)
*
*
*
(*)
Pohnpei, FSM
+7.9
+7.3
*
(+2.2)
+35.3
+35.0
*
(+2.7)
Kapingamarangi, FSM
*
*
*
(+2.8)
*
*
*
(+3.1)
Majuro, RMI
+5.8
+4.7
*
(+1.8)
+43.2
+39.9
*
(+2.9)
Kwajalein, RMI
+4.9
+4.6
+4.7
(+2.3)
+39.2
+38.8
+39.3
(+2.7)
Pago Pago, AS
+2.2
+2.4
+4.7
(+3.7)
+24.0
+23.2
+25.9
(+4.2)
Honolulu, Hawaii
-3.1
-1.9
-0.5
(+1.8)
+14.4
+17.5
+18.5
(+1.9)
Hilo, Hawaii
-2.6
-0.5
-1.1
(+2.0)
+18.1
+21.1
+20.8
(+2.4)

Note: - indicate negative deviations (fall of sea-level from the mean), and + indicate positive deviations (rise of sea-level from the mean); N/A: data not available. ** Sea level data for Chuuk is based on estimates from neighboring tide stations (Yap and Pohnpei) and observations from WSO Chuuk. Standard deviations describe how widely spread the values are in the dataset. See Table 1 for other notes.

Remarks: As compared to May 2010, the monthly mean sea level in June 2010, recorded a rise in most of the north Pacific stations (i.e., Guam, Palau, Yap, and Pohnpei). In the south Pacific, Pago Pago also recorded a rise in sea level. The rise in Malakal is quite significant. Yap also recorded considerable rise. The monthly maximum recorded slightly higher than normal in most stations. Again in Palau and Yap, the maximum is considerably higher than normal. The sea level in Palau and Yap responded differently than Guam and other Micronesia locations because these two stations are in a different regime of the dynamic sea level.

 

(iii) Forecast Verification (Seasonal Mean) for AMJ 2010

Observed and forecast seasonal sea level values for the AMJ 2010 season are presented in Figure 4. Forecasts were in general skillful; Malakal and Yap displayed a different picture, where a positive deviation was recorded despite negative forecast.

(iv) Tide Predictions (June 1 to September 30, 2010)

NOAA's web site for tide and currents has been used to generate the water level plot for the next four months. Predicted water level plots from June 1 to September 30, 2010 for five stations [(a) Marianas, Guam (b) Kwajalein, RMI (c) Pago Pago, American Samoa (d) Honolulu, Hawaii and (e) Hilo, Hawaii] are provided below.

 

Figure 5 (below): Predicted water level for the AMJ 2010 season at (a) Marianas, Guam (b) Kwajalein, RMI (c) Pago Pago, American Samoa, (d) Honolulu, HI and (e) Hilo, Hawaii. Data from NOAA/NOA/CO-OPS. X-axis: date/time (GMT); Y-axis: height in feet relative to Mean lower low water level (MLLW); MR: Mean-difference between high and low; SR: Difference between high and low tide during full moon (spring tide); and ML: Arithmetic means of high and low tides.

 

Predicted Water Level Plot for Guam

a) Marianas, Guam

 

Predicted Water Level Plot for RMI

b) Kwajalein, RMI

 

Predicted Water Level Plot for American Samoa

c) Pago-Pago, American Samoa

 

Predicted Water Level Plot for Honolulu

d) Honolulu, Hawaii

 

Predicted Water Level Plot for Hilo

e) Hilo, Hawaii



Pacific ENSO Applications Climate (PEAC) Center
c/o NOAA NWS - Weather Forecast Office Honolulu
2525 Correa Road, suite 250
Honolulu, HI 96822
(808) 956-2324

Web Master's email: peac@noaa.gov
Page Last Modified: August 04 2011 22:23:26 GMT

Disclaimer
Credits
Glossary

Privacy Policy
About Us
Career Opportunities