Skip Navigation Links weather.gov 
NOAA logo-Select to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service Forecast Office   Select to go to the NWS homepage
Pacific ENSO Applications Climate Center
banner piece
  banner piece
Local forecast by
"City, St" or Zip Code
Pacific ENSO Update

2nd Quarter, 2009 Vol. 15 No. 2


SEASONAL SEA LEVEL OUTLOOKS FOR THE U.S.-AFFILIATED PACIFIC ISLANDS


The following sections describe: (i) the Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)-based forecasts for maximum and mean sea level deviations for the forthcoming seasons, (ii) the observed monthly sea level deviations from the previous season (JFM 2009), (iii) forecast verification from the previous season and (iv) tide predictions for the current (AMJ 2009) season. All units are in inches. Note that ‘deviation’ is defined here as ‘the observed or forecast difference between the monthly mean [or maximum] and the climatological monthly mean values (from the period 1975- 1995) computed at each station’. (See Figure 2 at right for location of these stations.) Also, note that the forecasting technique adapted here does not account for sea level deviations created by other atmospheric or geological conditions such as tropical cyclones, storm surges or tsunamis.

tide station location
 

(i) Mean and Maximum Seasonal Sea Level Forecasts for April-May-June (AMJ), May-June-July (MJJ), and June-July-August (JJA) 2009.

Forecasts of the mean and maximum sea-level deviations in the USAPI are presented using CCA statistical model. Based on the independent SST values in JFM 2009, the resulting CCA model has been used to forecast the sea-level of three consecutive month periods: AMJ, MJJ and JJA 2009 (see Table 1). CCA cross-validation forecast skills for 0, 1, and 2-month leads are presented in Fig. 3

Table 1 : Forecasts of MEAN and MAXIMUM sea level deviation in inches for forthcoming seasons

 
(1) Seasonal Mean Deviations
(2) Seasonal Maximum Deviations
Tide Gauge Station
AMJ
MJJ
JJA

(3) Forecast Quality

AMJ
MJJ
JJA
(3) Forecast Quality
(4) RP for AMJ Season
(5) Lead Time
0
1M
2M
0
1M
2M
20 yr
100 yr
Marianas, Guam

+7

+7
+7
Good
+22
+23
+24
Good
5.6
6.7
Malakal, Palau
+2
+3
+4
Good
+37
+37
+39
Good
9.6
14.3
Yap, FSM
+4
+5
+5
Good
+32
+32
+33
Good
16.8
33.1
Chuuk, FSM**
+4
+3
+3
N/A
+32
+32
+33
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pohnpei, FSM
+4
+3
+2
Very Good
+34
+33
+36
Very Good
5.8
7.1
Kapingamarangi, FSM
+2
+2
+2
Very Good
+29
+29
+30
Very Good
7.4
9.4
Majuro, RMI
+2
+1
0
Good
+41
+39
+47
Good
4.1
5.1
Kwajalein, RMI
+4
+4
+3
Good
+42
+41
+36
Good
4.5
5.9
Pago Pago, AS
+4
+4
+3
Very Good
+28
+28
+31
Very Good
3.9
5.4
Honolulu, Hawaii (6)
0
0
+1
Fair
+22
+21
+22
Fair
4.1
5.9
Hilo, Hawaii (6)
0
0
+1
Fair
+22
+24
+25
Fair
7.9
11.4

Remarks: The positive sea-level deviations forecast for the AMJ, MJJ, and JJA 2009 seasons (Table 1, above) indicate that sea-levels will remain elevated 2-7 inches at all USAPI stations for the next several months, while the Hawaiian stations are expected to remain near normal. Consistent with the transition to ENSO-neutral conditions, mean sea levels are not expected to record any further rise; however, maximum sea levels may continue to rise 1 to 4 inches at all locations in the next 3-6 months, except at Majuro, where maximum sea level could increase up to 6 inches.

Note: (-) indicates negative deviations (fall of sea level from the mean), and (+) indicates positive deviations (rise of sea level from the mean); N/A: data not available. Deviations from -1 to +1 inch are considered negligible (***) and unlikely to cause any adverse climatic impact. Forecasts for Chuuk (**) are estimated subjectively based on information from WSO Chuuk and observations from neighboring stations of Pohnpei and Yap.

(1) Seasonal Mean Deviations is defined as the difference between the mean sea level for the given month and the 1975-1995 mean sea level value at each station. Likewise, (2) Seasonal Maximum Deviations is defined as the difference between the maximum sea level (calculated from hourly data) for the given month and the 1975-1995 mean sea level value at each station.

(3) Forecast Quality is a measure of the expected CCA cross-validation correlation skill. In general terms, these forecasts are thought to be of useful (but poor) skill if the CCA cross-validation value lies between 0.3 ~ 0.4 (Fig. 3). Higher skills correspond to a greater expected accuracy of the forecasts. Skill levels greater than 0.4 and 0.6 are thought to be fair and good, respectively, while skill levels greater than 0.7 are thought to be very good.

(4) Return Period (RP) of extreme values is calculated from hourly sea-level data. For example, the predicted rise of 5.6 inches at 20-year RP at Marianas, Guam indicates that this station may experience an extreme tide event once every 20 years that could result in sea level rise of up to 5.6 inches above the median of seasonal maxima during the AMJ season. Likewise, about once every 100 years we can expect the highest AMJ tide at Marianas, Guam to be as high as 6.7 inches above the median of seasonal maxima. During some seasons some stations display alarmingly high values at the 20 and 100 year RP. These high values are due to large and significant increases in the tidal range caused by the passage of past storm events during that season. Click here to view probability of exceedence graphs for the AMJ season.

(5) Lead time is the time interval between the end of the initial period and the beginning of the forecast period. For example, lead-0, lead-1M, and lead-2M means ‘sea-level’ of target season 0 (AMJ), 1 (MJJ), and 2 (JJA) month leads based on SSTs of JFM 2009.

(6) Hawaii stations of Honolulu and Hilo are newly added and should be considered experimental. Any feedback regarding the usefulness of these forecasts will be appreciated.

 

(ii) Observed monthly sea level deviation in January-February-March (JFM), 2009

The monthly time series (January - March) for sea level deviations have been taken from the UH Sea Level Center. Note that ‘deviation’ is defined here as ‘the observed or forecast difference between the monthly mean [or maximum] and the climatological monthly mean values (from the period 1975- 1995) computed at each station’.. Locations of all these stations are shown in Figure 2 (top of page).

Table 2: Monthly observed MEAN and MAX sea level deviations in inches for January, February and March 2009, with year to year standard deviations (SD).

Tide Gauge Station

(1) Monthly Mean Deviations
(2) Monthly Maximum Deviations
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
SD
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
SD
Marianas, Guam
+7.6
+8.8
+8.3
(+3.8)
+22.8
+23.4
+24.2
(+3.8)
Malakal, Palau
+4.8
+3.9
+2.9
(+4.5)
+43.2
+40.7
+38.6
(+4.9)
Yap, FSM
+4.1
+6.2
+6.7
(+3.8)
+31.5
+34.2
+32.8
(+4.4)
Chuuk, FSM **
*
*
*
(*)
*
*
*
(*)
Pohnpei, FSM
+6.2
+6.4
*
(+3.1)
+38.2
+36.4
*
(+3.2)
Kapingamarangi, FSM
+5.9
+6.9
+5.4
(+3.5)
+35.8
+34.5
+29.8
(+4.1)
Majuro, RMI
+4.2
+4.4
*
(+2.2)
+46.3
+47.5
*
(+2.5)
Kwajalein, RMI
+1.4
+2.9
*
(+2.4)
+41.9
+42.3
+36.2
(+2.8)
Pago Pago, AS
+4.1
*
*
(+2.6)
+30.8
*
*
(+2.0)
Honolulu, Hawaii
-0.7
-2.0
-1.9
(+1.7)
+21.8
+19.4
+14.9
(+2.0)
Hilo, Hawaii
+1.0
-1.0
-2.0
(+2.1)
+28.3
+23.4
+18.9
(+3.0)

Note: - indicate negative deviations (fall of sea-level from the mean), and + indicate positive deviations (rise of sea-level from the mean); N/A: data not available. ** Sea level data for Chuuk is based on estimates from neighboring tide stations (Yap and Pohnpei) and observations from WSO Chuuk. Standard deviations describe how widely spread the values are in the dataset. See Table 1 for other notes.

Remarks: As compared to February 2009, the mean/maxima of sea level in March 2009 was slightly lower at most stations. However, the observed values for seasonal mean/maxima are still elevated at all the USAPI stations. The Hawaiian stations, on the other hand, recorded further fall and are now slightly below normal. These trends (falling sea levels) are consistent with the weakening of La Niña and transition to ENSO-neutral conditions.

 

(iii) Forecast Verification (Seasonal Mean) for JFM 2009

Observed and forecast seasonal sea level values for the JFM 2009 season are presented in Figure 4. Forecasts were generally skillful; however, most locations were under-forecast by one to four inches.

(iv) Tide Predictions (April 1 to June 30, 2009)

NOAA's web site for tide and currents has been used to generate the water level plot for the next three months. Predicted water level plots from April 1 to June 30, 2009 for five stations [(a) Marianas, Guam (b) Kwajalein, RMI (c) Pago Pago, American Samoa (d) Honolulu, Hawaii and (e) Hilo, Hawaii] are provided below. Observations reveal that the MR, SR, and ML for all these above stations are likely to be 2-4 inches higher than average during the next three months.

 

Figure 5 (below): Predicted water level for the AMJ 2009 season at (a) Marianas, Guam (b) Kwajalein, RMI (c) Pago Pago, American Samoa, (d) Honolulu, HI and (e) Hilo, Hawaii. Data from NOAA/NOA/CO-OPS. X-axis: date/time (GMT); Y-axis: height in feet relative to Mean lower low water level (MLLW); MR: Mean-difference between high and low; SR: Difference between high and low tide during full moon (spring tide); and ML: Arithmetic means of high and low tides.

 

Predicted WL Guam

a) Marianas, Guam

 

Predicted WL RMI

b) Kwajalein, RMI

 

Predicted WL American Samoa

c) Pago-Pago, American Samoa

Predicted WL Honolulu

d) Honolulu, Hawaii

Predicted WL Hilo

e) Hilo, Hawaii



Pacific ENSO Applications Climate (PEAC) Center
c/o NOAA NWS - Weather Forecast Office Honolulu
2525 Correa Road, suite 250
Honolulu, HI 96822
(808) 956-2324

Web Master's email: peac@noaa.gov
Page Last Modified: August 04 2011 22:36:18 GMT

Disclaimer
Credits
Glossary

Privacy Policy
About Us
Career Opportunities